lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+mnGg9WRCJG82fTRMtit+HWC0e7FrVmmC-JqNQEuDArw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:56:14 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: shrink napi_skb_cache_put()

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 4:08 AM Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> BTW doesn't napi_skb_cache_get() (inc. get_bulk()) suffer the same way?

Probably, like other calls to napi_skb_cache_put(()

No loop there, so I guess there is no big deal.

I was looking at napi_skb_cache_put() because there is a lack of NUMA awareness,
and was curious to experiment with some strategies there.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ