netdev - Re: [PATCH leds v2 00/10] Add support for offloading netdev trigger to HW + example implementation for Turris Omnia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d510f5f-959c-49b7-afca-c02009898ef2@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:14:34 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH leds v2 00/10] Add support for offloading netdev trigger
 to HW + example implementation for Turris Omnia

> > Marek Behún (10):
> >   leds: trigger: netdev: don't explicitly zero kzalloced data
> >   leds: trigger: add API for HW offloading of triggers
> >   leds: trigger: netdev: move trigger data structure to global include
> >     dir
> >   leds: trigger: netdev: support HW offloading
> >   leds: trigger: netdev: change spinlock to mutex
> >   leds: core: inform trigger that it's deactivation is due to LED
> >     removal
> >   leds: turris-omnia: refactor sw mode setting code into separate
> >     function
> >   leds: turris-omnia: refactor brightness setting function
> >   leds: turris-omnia: initialize each multicolor LED to white color
> >   leds: turris-omnia: support offloading netdev trigger for WAN LED
> >
> Do you plan to progress with the above series anytime soon? If not I
> want to give this patch [0] again a respin.

What features are you missing from the current kernel code, which this
series adds?

	Andrew