[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fw4pvt7morcydktpqmmotab7pyvbixhrszgdfpl4dut52rfesf@4fztqcywdwpm>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:24:59 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Sabrina Dubroca <sdubroca@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute
features from lowers devices
Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 02:38:15PM +0200, liuhangbin@...il.com wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> How about "master_upper"? This is already widely used to refer to
>> >> bond/team/bridge/other master soft devices.
>> >>
>> >> MASTER_UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES?
>> >
>> >I'm not sure if we should avoid using "master" now. Maybe just UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES?
>>
>> Why? We have "master_upper" to point exactly at this kind of device.
>
>I mean try not use "master/slave" words. I'm OK to use UPPER_DEV_* prefix.
If you don't want to use that, change the existing code. But when the
existing code uses that, new code should be consistent with it.
>
>I will update the name if there is a next version.
>
>Thanks
>Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists