[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43d3c43c-ad4c-4a4e-96fa-d6cb026bf63f@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 22:15:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: stmmac: place .mac_finish() method
more appropriately
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 05:10:46PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Place the .mac_finish() initialiser and implementation after the
> .mac_config() initialiser and method which reflects the order that
> they appear in struct phylink_mac_ops, and the order in which they
> are called. This keeps logically similar code together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists