[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44c3937c-bf63-4e5f-a821-6c9adb4faf48@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 01:17:41 +0200
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@...e.de>
To: Cynthia <cynthia@...mx.dev>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: check visibility before changing group attribute
ownership
On 10/16/25 5:31 PM, Cynthia wrote:
> [...]
>>> ? psi_task_switch+0x113/0x2a0
>>> ? __pfx_rtnl_newlink+0x10/0x10
>>> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x346/0x3e0
>>> ? sched_clock+0x10/0x30
>>> ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
>>> netlink_rcv_skb+0x59/0x110
>>> netlink_unicast+0x285/0x3c0
>>> ? __alloc_skb+0xdb/0x1a0
>>> netlink_sendmsg+0x20d/0x430
>>> ____sys_sendmsg+0x39f/0x3d0
>>> ? import_iovec+0x2f/0x40
>>> ___sys_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0
>>> __sys_sendmsg+0x8a/0xf0
>>> do_syscall_64+0x81/0x970
>>> ? __sys_bind+0xe3/0x110
>>> ? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
>>> ? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
>>> ? sock_alloc_file+0x63/0xc0
>>> ? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
>>> ? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
>>> ? alloc_fd+0x12e/0x190
>>> ? put_unused_fd+0x2a/0x70
>>> ? do_sys_openat2+0xa2/0xe0
>>> ? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
>>> ? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
>>> ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x1a0
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>>> [...]
>>> </TASK>
>>>
>>> Fix this by checking is_visible() before trying to touch the attribute.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 303a42769c4c ("sysfs: add sysfs_group{s}_change_owner()")
>>> Reported-by: Cynthia <cynthia@...mx.dev>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/01070199e22de7f8-28f711ab-
>>> d3f1-46d9-b9a0-048ab05eb09b-000000@...central-1.amazonses.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@...e.de>
>>> ---
>>> fs/sysfs/group.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> Nice, thanks! This has been tested, right?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> I did a quick test just now, it works in the VM (no warn and the
> container is running).
>
Same here, I tested it while doing the patch using the reproducer
provided on the report.
Thanks,
Fernando.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists