netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] net: mana: Support HW link state events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251017160541.4ce65ede@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:05:41 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 haiyangz@...rosoft.com, paulros@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com,
 kys@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, longli@...rosoft.com,
 ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, ernis@...ux.microsoft.com,
 dipayanroy@...ux.microsoft.com, kotaranov@...rosoft.com, horms@...nel.org,
 shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com, leon@...nel.org, mlevitsk@...hat.com,
 yury.norov@...il.com, shirazsaleem@...rosoft.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] net: mana: Support HW link state events

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:26:49 -0700 Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> 
> Handle the HW link state events received from HW channel, and
> set the proper link state, also stop/wake queues accordingly.

Why do you have to stop / start the queues? I think it's unusual.
Let the packets get dropped, sending out potentially old packets
when link comes back is not going to make anyone happier.

> +static void mana_link_state_handle(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct mana_port_context *apc;
> +	struct mana_context *ac;
> +	struct net_device *ndev;
> +	bool link_up;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	ac = container_of(w, struct mana_context, link_change_work);
> +
> +	if (ac->mana_removing)
> +		return;
> +
> +	rtnl_lock();
> +

> @@ -3500,6 +3556,10 @@ void mana_remove(struct gdma_dev *gd, bool suspending)
>  	int err;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	ac->mana_removing = true;
> +
> +	cancel_work_sync(&ac->link_change_work);

Looks racy, the work needs @ac to check the ->mana_removing but
mana_remove() frees @ac. Just use disable_work_sync() please.
-- 
pw-bot: cr