[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <176074466364.1793333.7771684363912648120@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 10:44:23 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...mail.net>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Alexander Aring" <alex.aring@...il.com>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@...nel.org>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@...nel.org>, "Steve French" <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"Paulo Alcantara" <pc@...guebit.org>,
"Ronnie Sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
"Shyam Prasad N" <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>,
"Bharath SM" <bharathsm@...rosoft.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Tyler Hicks" <code@...icks.com>,
"Olga Kornievskaia" <okorniev@...hat.com>,
"Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"Namjae Jeon" <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
"Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
"Carlos Maiolino" <cem@...nel.org>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Simon Horman" <horms@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] vfs: recall-only directory delegations for knfsd
On Fri, 17 Oct 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A smaller variation of the v1 patchset that I posted earlier this week.
> Neil's review inspired me to get rid of the lm_may_setlease operation
> and to do the conflict resolution internally inside of nfsd. That means
> a smaller VFS-layer change, and an overall reduction in code.
>
> This patchset adds support for directory delegations to nfsd. This
> version only supports recallable delegations. There is no CB_NOTIFY
> support yet. I have patches for those, but we've decided to add that
> support in a later kernel once we get some experience with this part.
> Anna is working on the client-side pieces.
>
> It would be great if we could get into linux-next soon so that it can be
> merged for v6.19. Christian, could you pick up the vfs/filelock patches,
> and Chuck pick up the nfsd patches?
>
> Thanks!
> Jeff
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240315-dir-deleg-v1-0-a1d6209a3654@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - handle lease conflict resolution inside of nfsd
> - drop the lm_may_setlease lock_manager operation
> - just add extra argument to vfs_create() instead of creating wrapper
> - don't allocate fsnotify_mark for open directories
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251013-dir-deleg-ro-v1-0-406780a70e5e@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Jeff Layton (11):
> filelock: push the S_ISREG check down to ->setlease handlers
> vfs: add try_break_deleg calls for parents to vfs_{link,rename,unlink}
> vfs: allow mkdir to wait for delegation break on parent
> vfs: allow rmdir to wait for delegation break on parent
> vfs: break parent dir delegations in open(..., O_CREAT) codepath
> vfs: make vfs_create break delegations on parent directory
> vfs: make vfs_mknod break delegations on parent directory
> filelock: lift the ban on directory leases in generic_setlease
> nfsd: allow filecache to hold S_IFDIR files
> nfsd: allow DELEGRETURN on directories
> nfsd: wire up GET_DIR_DELEGATION handling
vfs_symlink() is missing from the updated APIs. Surely that needs to be
able to wait for a delegation to break.
vfs_mkobj() maybe does too, but I could easily turn a blind eye to that.
I haven't looked properly at the last patch but all the other could have
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
once the vfs_symlink() omission is fixed.
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists