[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32086239-2fd5-42bd-a554-d0e3c263bb0c@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:25:00 +0200
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@...e.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, csmate@....hu, kerneljasonxing@...il.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, bjorn@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xsk: avoid data corruption on cq descriptor number
On 10/21/25 6:25 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:06:56PM +0200, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -774,6 +777,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>> {
>> struct net_device *dev = xs->dev;
>> struct sk_buff *skb = xs->skb;
>> + struct page *page;
>> int err;
>>
>> if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR) {
>> @@ -791,6 +795,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>> len = desc->len;
>>
>> if (!skb) {
>> + struct xsk_addr_node *head_addr;
>> +
>> hr = max(NET_SKB_PAD, L1_CACHE_ALIGN(dev->needed_headroom));
>> tr = dev->needed_tailroom;
>> skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, hr + len + tr, 1, &err);
>> @@ -804,7 +810,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>> if (unlikely(err))
>> goto free_err;
>>
>> - xsk_skb_init_misc(skb, xs, desc->addr);
>> + head_addr = kmem_cache_zalloc(xsk_tx_generic_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!head_addr) {
>> + __free_page(page);
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> Perhaps the page changes to xsk_build_skb() aren't needed
> because page seems to be uninitialised here.
>
> Flagged by W=1 builds with Clang 21.1.1, and Smatch.
>
Ah, I don't know know what I was thinking about.. but yes, that page
handling isn't needed of course as it isn't initialized. (I even needed
the page struct because it wasn't available in that context).
I will send a V2 patch if the proposed solution is accepted. In additon,
the performance impact isn't as bad as I thought.. just 4 bytes pero
skb.. as the cache must be initialized anyway.
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto free_err;
>> + }
>> + xsk_skb_init_misc(skb, xs, head_addr, desc->addr);
>> if (desc->options & XDP_TX_METADATA) {
>> err = xsk_skb_metadata(skb, buffer, desc,
>> xs->pool, hr);
>> @@ -814,7 +826,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>> } else {
>> int nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>> struct xsk_addr_node *xsk_addr;
>> - struct page *page;
>> u8 *vaddr;
>>
>> if (unlikely(nr_frags == (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - 1) && xp_mb_desc(desc))) {
>> @@ -843,7 +854,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>> refcount_add(PAGE_SIZE, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc);
>>
>> xsk_addr->addr = desc->addr;
>> - list_add_tail(&xsk_addr->addr_node, &XSKCB(skb)->addrs_list);
>> + list_add_tail(&xsk_addr->addr_node, &XSK_TX_HEAD(skb)->addr_node);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.51.0
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists