lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a01172d1-d902-4d55-bc1e-c8234985e65a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:28:42 -0400
From: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Danilo Krummrich
 <dakr@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
 Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>, Michal Hocko
 <mhocko@...e.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/33] sched/isolation: Flush memcg workqueues on cpuset
 isolated partition change

On 10/21/25 3:16 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 10/13/25 4:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> The HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask is now modifyable at runtime. In
>> order to synchronize against memcg workqueue to make sure that no
>> asynchronous draining is still pending or executing on a newly made
>> isolated CPU, the housekeeping susbsystem must flush the memcg
>> workqueues.
>>
>> However the memcg workqueues can't be flushed easily since they are
>> queued to the main per-CPU workqueue pool.
>>
>> Solve this with creating a memcg specific pool and provide and use the
>> appropriate flushing API.
>>
>> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/memcontrol.h |  4 ++++
>>   kernel/sched/isolation.c   |  2 ++
>>   kernel/sched/sched.h       |  1 +
>>   mm/memcontrol.c            | 12 +++++++++++-
>>   4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> index 873e510d6f8d..001200df63cf 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> @@ -1074,6 +1074,8 @@ static inline u64 cgroup_id_from_mm(struct 
>> mm_struct *mm)
>>       return id;
>>   }
>>   +void mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue(void);
>> +
>>   extern int mem_cgroup_init(void);
>>   #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
>>   @@ -1481,6 +1483,8 @@ static inline u64 cgroup_id_from_mm(struct 
>> mm_struct *mm)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   +static inline void mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue(void) { }
>> +
>>   static inline int mem_cgroup_init(void) { return 0; }
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
>>   diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> index 95d69c2102f6..9ec365dea921 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, 
>> enum hk_type type)
>>         synchronize_rcu();
>>   +    mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue();
>> +
>>       kfree(old);
>>         return 0;
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index 8fac8aa451c6..8bfc0b4b133f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/lockdep_api.h>
>>   #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>>   #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> +#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>>   #include <linux/minmax.h>
>>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 1033e52ab6cf..1aa14e543f35 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static bool cgroup_memory_nokmem __ro_after_init;
>>   /* BPF memory accounting disabled? */
>>   static bool cgroup_memory_nobpf __ro_after_init;
>>   +static struct workqueue_struct *memcg_wq __ro_after_init;
>> +
>>   static struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
>>   static struct kmem_cache *memcg_pn_cachep;
>>   @@ -1975,7 +1977,7 @@ static void schedule_drain_work(int cpu, 
>> struct work_struct *work)
>>   {
>>       guard(rcu)();
>>       if (!cpu_is_isolated(cpu))
>> -        schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
>> +        queue_work_on(cpu, memcg_wq, work);
>>   }
>>     /*
>> @@ -5092,6 +5094,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_uncharge(const struct sock 
>> *sk, unsigned int nr_pages)
>>       refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
>>   }
>>   +void mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue(void)
>> +{
>> +    flush_workqueue(memcg_wq);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __init cgroup_memory(char *s)
>>   {
>>       char *token;
>> @@ -5134,6 +5141,9 @@ int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
>>       cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_MEMCQ_DEAD, 
>> "mm/memctrl:dead", NULL,
>>                     memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead);
>>   +    memcg_wq = alloc_workqueue("memcg", 0, 0);
>
> Should we explicitly mark the memcg_wq as WQ_PERCPU even though I 
> think percpu is the default. The schedule_work_on() schedules work on 
> the system_percpu_wq. 

According to commit dadb3ebcf39 ("workqueue: WQ_PERCPU added to 
alloc_workqueue users"), the default may be changed to WQ_UNBOUND in the 
future.

Cheers,
Longman


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ