[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251021161447.311a3e0f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:14:47 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: micrel: Add support for non PTP SKUs
for lan8814
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 20:11:13 +0200 Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> >> Hasn't net also switched to the common kernel multiline comment style
> >> starting with an empty line?
> >
> > I am not sure because I can see some previous commits where people used
> > the same comment style:
> > e82c64be9b45 ("net: stmmac: avoid PHY speed change when configuring MTU")
> > 100dfa74cad9 ("net: dev_queue_xmit() llist adoption")
>
> The special coding style for multi line comments for net and drivers/net
> has been removed with
> 82b8000c28 ("net: drop special comment style")
>
> But I checked a few mails on the list and also found the old style in
> new patches.
We removed the check that _suggests_ the use of the superior style.
Aesthetic taste is not evenly distributed within the population.
But we still prefer the old style in netdev.
That said I don't think nit picking on comment style is productive,
in either direction.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists