lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e02915f-bde7-4b04-b760-89f34fb0a436@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:10:16 -0400
From: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Danilo Krummrich
 <dakr@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
 Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>, Michal Hocko
 <mhocko@...e.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset

On 10/13/25 4:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Until now, HK_TYPE_DOMAIN used to only include boot defined isolated
> CPUs passed through isolcpus= boot option. Users interested in also
> knowing the runtime defined isolated CPUs through cpuset must use
> different APIs: cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(), cpu_is_isolated(), etc...
>
> There are many drawbacks to that approach:
>
> 1) Most interested subsystems want to know about all isolated CPUs, not
>    just those defined on boot time.
>
> 2) cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() / cpu_is_isolated() are not synchronized with
>    concurrent cpuset changes.
>
> 3) Further cpuset modifications are not propagated to subsystems
>
> Solve 1) and 2) and centralize all isolated CPUs within the
> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask.
>
> Subsystems can rely on RCU to synchronize against concurrent changes.
>
> The propagation mentioned in 3) will be handled in further patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> ---
>   include/linux/sched/isolation.h |  2 +
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c          |  2 +
>   kernel/sched/isolation.c        | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   kernel/sched/sched.h            |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> index da22b038942a..94d5c835121b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ extern const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type);
>   extern bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type);
>   extern void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t, enum hk_type type);
>   extern bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type);
> +extern int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type);
>   extern void __init housekeeping_init(void);
>   
>   #else
> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ static inline bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static inline int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type) { return 0; }
>   static inline void housekeeping_init(void) { }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_ISOLATION */
>   
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index aa1ac7bcf2ea..b04a4242f2fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1403,6 +1403,8 @@ static void update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(bool isolcpus_updated)
>   
>   	ret = workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask(isolated_cpus);
>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
> +	ret = housekeeping_update(isolated_cpus, HK_TYPE_DOMAIN);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
>   }
>   
>   /**
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index b46c20b5437f..95d69c2102f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -29,18 +29,48 @@ static struct housekeeping housekeeping;
>   
>   bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
>   {
> -	return !!(housekeeping.flags & BIT(type));
> +	return !!(READ_ONCE(housekeeping.flags) & BIT(type));
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_enabled);
>   
> +static bool housekeeping_dereference_check(enum hk_type type)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && type == HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) {
> +		/* Cpuset isn't even writable yet? */
> +		if (system_state <= SYSTEM_SCHEDULING)
> +			return true;
> +
> +		/* CPU hotplug write locked, so cpuset partition can't be overwritten */
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_write_held())
> +			return true;
> +
> +		/* Cpuset lock held, partitions not writable */
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUSETS) && lockdep_is_cpuset_held())
> +			return true;

I have some doubt about this condition as the cpuset_mutex may be held 
in the process of making changes to an isolated partition that will 
impact HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask.

Cheers,
Longman


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ