lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPi+cfwuGq2r+8RZ@boxer>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:22:25 +0200
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
	<hawk@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
	<daniel@...earbox.net>, <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, <toke@...hat.com>,
	<lorenzo@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
	<andrii@...nel.org>, <stfomichev@...il.com>,
	<syzbot+ff145014d6b0ce64a173@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, Ihor Solodrai
	<ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>, Octavian Purdila <tavip@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] xdp: update xdp_rxq_info's mem type in XDP
 generic hook

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 06:01:36PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 19:53:26 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > > > The SKB should be marked via skb->pp_recycle, but I guess you are trying
> > > > to catch code that doesn't set this correctly?
> > > > (Slightly worried this will "paper-over" some other buggy code?)
> > > >   
> > > >> +    xdp->rxq->mem.type = page_pool_page_is_pp(virt_to_page(xdp->data)) ?  
> > > 
> > > BTW this may return incorrect results if the page is not order-0.
> > > IIRC system PPs always return order-0 pages, what about veth code etc?  
> > 
> > veth's pp works on order-0 pages well, however I agree it would be better
> > to use virt_to_head_page() here.
> 
> In this case the mem.type update is for consuming frags only, right?
> We can't free the head itself since the skb is attached to it.
> So running the predicates on xdp->data is probably wrong.

See the veth patch where we bump refcount of related pages in order to
keep the data as skb is consumed.

> 
> Is it possible to get to bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp() (with frags)
> and without going thru netif_skb_check_for_xdp() ? If no then
> frags must have come from skb_pp_cow(). 
> And the type is always MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL ?

We have a fallback path netif_skb_check_for_xdp() that linearizes skb, in
case COW code failed. But bare in mind that bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp() has
other callsites, besides generic XDP itself (cpumap and devmap). That is
why I wouldn't like to base this helper on assumptions such as frags
presence -> mem_type is pp.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ