[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANhDHd_iPWgSuxi-6EVWE2HVbFUKqfuGoo-p_vcZgNst=RSqCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:01:50 +0200
From: Andrii Melnychenko <a.melnychenko@...s.io>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, kadlec@...filter.org, phil@....cc,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] nft_ct: Added nfct_seqadj_ext_add() for NAT'ed conntrack.
Hi all,
> BTW, this fixes DNAT case, but SNAT case is still broken because flag
> is set at a later stage, right?
I've checked SNAT with the "PORT" FTP command - didn't reproduce the bug.
I assume that `nft_nat_eval()` -> `nf_nat_setup_info()` sets up seqadj
for the SNAT case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists