[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68f94fbe.050a0220.346f24.0067.GAE@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:42:22 -0700
From: syzbot ci <syzbot+ci2764742843991e4e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: biancaa2210329@....edu.in, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: syzbot@...ts.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot ci] Re: Signed-off-by: Biancaa Ramesh <biancaa2210329@....edu.in>
syzbot ci has tested the following series
[v1] Signed-off-by: Biancaa Ramesh <biancaa2210329@....edu.in>
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251022172045.57132-1-biancaa2210329@ssn.edu.in
* [PATCH] Signed-off-by: Biancaa Ramesh <biancaa2210329@....edu.in>
and found the following issue:
inconsistent lock state in valid_state
Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/633a22d7-da77-4e0d-b8b2-b83308d1ada4
***
inconsistent lock state in valid_state
tree: net-next
URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
base: 3ff9bcecce83f12169ab3e42671bd76554ca521a
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/fdd7ef69-8bca-4916-9206-338917b91147/config
C repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/5f542249-1f70-4702-b6c1-a89d7087a30c/c_repro
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/5f542249-1f70-4702-b6c1-a89d7087a30c/syz_repro
================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/0/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888114c211e0 (slock-AF_LLC){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff888114c211e0 (slock-AF_LLC){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: llc_conn_tmr_common_cb+0x3d/0x830 net/llc/llc_c_ac.c:1325
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
llc_conn_state_process+0xb1/0x1390 net/llc/llc_conn.c:72
llc_establish_connection+0x334/0x4d0 net/llc/llc_if.c:113
llc_ui_connect+0x3a0/0xd30 net/llc/af_llc.c:511
__sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2102 [inline]
__sys_connect+0x316/0x440 net/socket.c:2121
__do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2127 [inline]
__se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2124 [inline]
__x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2124
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
irq event stamp: 874834
hardirqs last enabled at (874834): [<ffffffff8b480725>] __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:151 [inline]
hardirqs last enabled at (874834): [<ffffffff8b480725>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x85/0x110 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194
hardirqs last disabled at (874833): [<ffffffff8b480462>] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (874833): [<ffffffff8b480462>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x82/0xf0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
softirqs last enabled at (874680): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (874680): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:496 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (874680): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] __irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:723
softirqs last disabled at (874827): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (874827): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:496 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (874827): [<ffffffff8184ccfa>] __irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:723
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(slock-AF_LLC);
<Interrupt>
lock(slock-AF_LLC);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
#0: ffffc90000007be0 ((&llc->ack_timer.timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0xbe/0x5f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1744
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_usage_bug+0x297/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4042
valid_state+0xc3/0xf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4056
mark_lock_irq+0x36/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4267
mark_lock+0x11b/0x190 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4753
mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:-1 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x680/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5191
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
llc_conn_tmr_common_cb+0x3d/0x830 net/llc/llc_c_ac.c:1325
call_timer_fn+0x17e/0x5f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1747
expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1798 [inline]
__run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2372 [inline]
__run_timer_base+0x61a/0x860 kernel/time/timer.c:2384
run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2393 [inline]
run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x180 kernel/time/timer.c:2403
handle_softirqs+0x286/0x870 kernel/softirq.c:622
__do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline]
invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:496 [inline]
__irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:723
irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:739
instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052 [inline]
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:697
RIP: 0010:pv_native_safe_halt+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:82
Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa eb 07 0f 00 2d 33 c1 22 00 f3 0f 1e fa fb f4 <e9> c8 e6 02 00 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0018:ffffffff8dc07d80 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: cf42be3493bb8800 RBX: ffffffff81967c07 RCX: cf42be3493bb8800
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff8d70c034 RDI: ffffffff8bbf0860
RBP: ffffffff8dc07ea8 R08: ffff888121232fdb R09: 1ffff110242465fb
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed10242465fc R12: ffffffff8f7ce370
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 1ffffffff1b92a40
arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:107 [inline]
default_idle+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:767
default_idle_call+0x73/0xb0 kernel/sched/idle.c:122
cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:190 [inline]
do_idle+0x1e7/0x510 kernel/sched/idle.c:330
cpu_startup_entry+0x44/0x60 kernel/sched/idle.c:428
rest_init+0x2de/0x300 init/main.c:757
start_kernel+0x3ae/0x410 init/main.c:1111
x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:310
x86_64_start_kernel+0x143/0x1c0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:291
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: cc int3
1: cc int3
2: cc int3
3: cc int3
4: cc int3
5: cc int3
6: cc int3
7: 90 nop
8: 90 nop
9: 90 nop
a: 90 nop
b: 90 nop
c: 90 nop
d: 90 nop
e: 90 nop
f: 90 nop
10: 90 nop
11: 90 nop
12: 90 nop
13: 90 nop
14: 90 nop
15: 90 nop
16: 90 nop
17: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
1b: eb 07 jmp 0x24
1d: 0f 00 2d 33 c1 22 00 verw 0x22c133(%rip) # 0x22c157
24: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
28: fb sti
29: f4 hlt
* 2a: e9 c8 e6 02 00 jmp 0x2e6f7 <-- trapping instruction
2f: cc int3
30: cc int3
31: cc int3
32: cc int3
33: cc int3
34: cc int3
35: cc int3
36: cc int3
37: 90 nop
38: 90 nop
39: 90 nop
3a: 90 nop
3b: 90 nop
3c: 90 nop
3d: 90 nop
3e: 90 nop
3f: 90 nop
***
If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syzbot@...kaller.appspotmail.com
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists