[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1abbcd93-6144-440c-90d9-439d0f18383b@altera.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:01:20 +0530
From: "G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@...era.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>,
"Ng, Boon Khai" <boon.khai.ng@...era.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] net: stmmac: vlan: Disable 802.1AD tag
insertion offload
Hi Russell,
On 10/18/2025 7:26 AM, G Thomas, Rohan wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On 10/17/2025 6:12 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 02:11:19PM +0800, Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> index 650d75b73e0b0ecd02d35dd5d6a8742d45188c47..dedaaef3208bfadc105961029f79d0d26c3289d8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> @@ -4089,18 +4089,11 @@ static int stmmac_release(struct net_device *dev)
>>> static bool stmmac_vlan_insert(struct stmmac_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> struct stmmac_tx_queue *tx_q)
>>> {
>>> - u16 tag = 0x0, inner_tag = 0x0;
>>> - u32 inner_type = 0x0;
>>> + u16 tag = 0x0;
>>> struct dma_desc *p;
>>
>> #include <stdnetdevcodeformat.h> - Please maintain reverse christmas-
>> tree order.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I'll fix the declaration order in the next
> revision.
>
>>
>> I haven't yet referred to the databook, so there may be more comments
>> coming next week.
>>
>
> Sure! Will wait for your feedback before sending the next revision.
Just checking in — have you had a chance to review the patch further? Or
would it be okay for me to go ahead and send the next revision for
review?
>
> Best Regards,
> Rohan
Best Regards,
Rohan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists