[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28d91eca-28dd-4e5b-ae60-021e777ee064@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:44:07 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: stmmac: hwif.c cleanups
Hello Russell,
On 23/10/2025 11:36, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series cleans up hwif.c:
>
> - move the reading of the version information out of stmmac_hwif_init()
> into its own function, stmmac_get_version(), storing the result in a
> new struct.
>
> - simplify stmmac_get_version().
>
> - read the version register once, passing it to stmmac_get_id() and
> stmmac_get_dev_id().
>
> - move stmmac_get_id() and stmmac_get_dev_id() into
> stmmac_get_version()
>
> - define version register fields and use FIELD_GET() to decode
>
> - start tackling the big loop in stmmac_hwif_init() - provide a
> function, stmmac_hwif_find(), which looks up the hwif entry, thus
> making a much smaller loop, which improves readability of this code.
>
> - change the use of '^' to '!=' when comparing the dev_id, which is
> what is really meant here.
>
> - reorganise the test after calling stmmac_hwif_init() so that we
> handle the error case in the indented code, and the success case
> with no indent, which is the classical arrangement.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 3 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c | 166 +++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
I didn't have the bandwidth to do a full review, however I ran tests
with this series on dwmac-socfpga and dwmac-stm32, no regressions found.
For the series,
Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists