lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251025160905.3857885-95-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:55:26 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	chuck.lever@...cle.com,
	matttbe@...nel.org,
	alexander.deucher@....com,
	alexandre.f.demers@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17] netlink: specs: fou: change local-v6/peer-v6 check

From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>

[ Upstream commit 9f9581ba74a931843c6d807ecfeaff9fb8c1b731 ]

While updating the binary min-len implementation, I noticed that
the only user, should AFAICT be using exact-len instead.

In net/ipv4/fou_core.c FOU_ATTR_LOCAL_V6 and FOU_ATTR_PEER_V6
are only used for singular IPv6 addresses, and there are AFAICT
no known implementations trying to send more, it therefore
appears safe to change it to an exact-len policy.

This patch therefore changes the local-v6/peer-v6 attributes to
use an exact-len check, instead of a min-len check.

Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250902154640.759815-2-ast@fiberby.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---

LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:

YES

- What changed: The fou netlink spec and generated policy now enforce
  exact 16‑byte lengths for IPv6 address attributes instead of allowing
  any payload ≥16 bytes.
  - Documentation change: `Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml:55` and
    `Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml:63` switch `checks` from `min-
    len: 16` to `exact-len: 16`.
  - Generated policy change: `net/ipv4/fou_nl.c:21` and
    `net/ipv4/fou_nl.c:23` switch from a plain length to
    `NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(16)` for `FOU_ATTR_LOCAL_V6` and
    `FOU_ATTR_PEER_V6`.

- Why it matters: Fou only ever uses a single IPv6 address for these
  attributes; there is no valid case for longer payloads. The parser
  reads exactly one IPv6 address with `nla_get_in6_addr()`:
  - Read paths: `net/ipv4/fou_core.c:716` (LOCAL_V6) and
    `net/ipv4/fou_core.c:722` (PEER_V6) copy exactly 16 bytes.
  - Reply paths also emit exactly 16 bytes with `nla_put_in6_addr()`
    (`net/ipv4/fou_core.c:801`, `net/ipv4/fou_core.c:805`), confirming
    the intent is a fixed-size IPv6 address.

- Bug fixed: With a min-length check, malformed attributes longer than
  16 bytes are accepted and silently truncated by `nla_get_in6_addr()`.
  This change correctly rejects such input at policy time, aligning
  validation with actual usage and preventing garbage/trailing data from
  slipping through.

- Scope and risk:
  - Small and contained: Only touches fou’s netlink policy and its spec;
    no broader architectural or behavioral changes.
  - ABI correctness: Tightens validation to the actual fixed-size ABI
    already assumed by the code and reply side.
  - Compatibility: Legitimate userspace already sends 16‑byte IPv6
    addresses; the commit message notes no known implementations rely on
    larger lengths. Any breakage would only affect incorrect/malformed
    senders, which is desired.
  - Consistency: Matches common practice elsewhere for IPv6 attributes
    (e.g., other generated policies using `NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(16)`).

- Stable backport criteria:
  - Fixes a real validation/robustness bug that could affect users
    (acceptance of malformed attributes).
  - Minimal risk of regression and no architectural changes.
  - Confined to a specific subsystem (fou netlink family).
  - Clear, small change with direct correspondence between spec and
    code.

Given the above, this is a low-risk, correctness/robustness fix that
should be backported.

 Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml | 4 ++--
 net/ipv4/fou_nl.c                    | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
index 57735726262ec..8e7974ec453fc 100644
--- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ attribute-sets:
         name: local-v6
         type: binary
         checks:
-          min-len: 16
+          exact-len: 16
       -
         name: peer-v4
         type: u32
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ attribute-sets:
         name: peer-v6
         type: binary
         checks:
-          min-len: 16
+          exact-len: 16
       -
         name: peer-port
         type: u16
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fou_nl.c b/net/ipv4/fou_nl.c
index 3d9614609b2d3..506260b4a4dc2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fou_nl.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fou_nl.c
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ const struct nla_policy fou_nl_policy[FOU_ATTR_IFINDEX + 1] = {
 	[FOU_ATTR_TYPE] = { .type = NLA_U8, },
 	[FOU_ATTR_REMCSUM_NOPARTIAL] = { .type = NLA_FLAG, },
 	[FOU_ATTR_LOCAL_V4] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
-	[FOU_ATTR_LOCAL_V6] = { .len = 16, },
+	[FOU_ATTR_LOCAL_V6] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(16),
 	[FOU_ATTR_PEER_V4] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
-	[FOU_ATTR_PEER_V6] = { .len = 16, },
+	[FOU_ATTR_PEER_V6] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(16),
 	[FOU_ATTR_PEER_PORT] = { .type = NLA_BE16, },
 	[FOU_ATTR_IFINDEX] = { .type = NLA_S32, },
 };
-- 
2.51.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ