netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: add support specifying PCS supported interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQCcVOYV15SeHAMU@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:35:00 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Alexis Lothor__ <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Boon Khai Ng <boon.khai.ng@...era.com>,
	Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: add support specifying PCS
 supported interfaces

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hello Russell,
> 
> On 25/10/2025 22:48, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> 
> Maybe this needs a commit log, even a small one ? :(

Thanks for giving Jakub a reason to mark this "changes required." :D
I'm not really expecting this to be merged as-is. So why didn't I
post it as RFC? Too many people see "RFC" as a sign to ignore the
patch series. Some people claim that "RFC" means it isn't ready and
thus isn't worth reviewing/testing/etc. I say to those people... I
can learn their game and work around their behaviour.

Yes, it will need a better commit log, but what I'm much much more
interested in is having people who are using the integrated PCS (in
SGMII mode as that's all we support) to test this, especially
dwmac-qcom-ethqos folk.

The 2.5G support was submitted by Sneh Shah, and my attempts to make
contact have resulted in no response.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!