[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251028212639.2802158-1-dw@davidwei.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:26:39 -0700
From: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net v1] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but
io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev().
Fix this by taking the instance lock.
Opted to do this by hand instead of netdev_get_by_index_lock(), which is
an older helper that doesn't take netdev tracker.
Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
---
io_uring/zcrx.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
index a816f5902091..55010c0aa7b9 100644
--- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
+++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
@@ -606,11 +606,13 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
goto err;
}
+ netdev_lock(ifq->netdev);
ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq);
if (!ifq->dev) {
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- goto err;
+ goto netdev_unlock;
}
+ netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev);
get_device(ifq->dev);
ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area);
@@ -640,6 +642,8 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
goto err;
}
return 0;
+netdev_unlock:
+ netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev);
err:
scoped_guard(mutex, &ctx->mmap_lock)
xa_erase(&ctx->zcrx_ctxs, id);
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists