[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251029165457.557f8f7d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:54:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe
<axboe@...nel.dk>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call
netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:54 -0700 David Wei wrote:
> + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx);
> if (!ifq->netdev) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
> }
>
> ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq);
> if (!ifq->dev) {
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
> }
> + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
> get_device(ifq->dev);
>
> ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area);
> if (ret)
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
Without looking at larger context this looks sus.
You're jumping to the same label before and after you took the ref on
the netdev..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists