[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7148e00e-14c4-4eb7-a940-112e86902bc2@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 21:58:33 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] xfrm docs update
On 10/29/25 1:26 AM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are xfrm documentation patches. Patches [1-4/6] are formatting polishing;
> [5/6] groups the docs and [6/6] adds MAINTAINERS entries for them.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Bagas Sanjaya (6):
> Documentation: xfrm_device: Wrap iproute2 snippets in literal code
> block
> Documentation: xfrm_device: Use numbered list for offloading steps
> Documentation: xfrm_device: Separate hardware offload sublists
> Documentation: xfrm_sync: Properly reindent list text
> net: Move XFRM documentation into its own subdirectory
> MAINTAINERS: Add entry for XFRM documentation
LGTM. Thanks.
for the series:
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
OK, one small nit. 3 of the section headings end with ':'
that should not be there. See xfrm/index.html:
XFRM Framework
XFRM device - offloading the IPsec computations
Overview
Callbacks to implement
Flow
XFRM proc - /proc/net/xfrm_* files
Transformation Statistics
XFRM sync
1) Message Structure
2) TLVS reflect the different parameters:
3) Default configurations for the parameters:
4) Message types
Exceptions to threshold settings
XFRM Syscall
/proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_* Variables:
Oh, and could/should
Exceptions to threshold settings
be numbered, 5) ? It looks odd to be unnumbered.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists