[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c374df85-23ec-4324-b966-9f2b3a74489a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:51:19 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call
netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
On 11/1/25 02:24, David Wei wrote:
> netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but
> io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev().
> Fix this by taking the instance lock using netdev_get_by_index_lock().
>
> Extended the instance lock section to include attaching a memory
> provider. Could not move io_zcrx_create_area() outside, since the dmabuf
> codepath IORING_ZCRX_AREA_DMABUF requires ifq->dev.
It's probably fine for now, but this nested waiting feels
uncomfortable considering that it could be waiting for other
devices to finish IO via dmabuf fences.
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists