lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQjDjaQzv+Y4U6NL@boxer>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:00:29 +0100
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <bjorn@...nel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
	<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, <sdf@...ichev.me>, <ast@...nel.org>,
	<daniel@...earbox.net>, <hawk@...nel.org>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	<joe@...a.to>, <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, <fmancera@...e.de>,
	<csmate@....hu>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jason Xing
	<kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/2] xsk: introduce a cached cq to
 temporarily store descriptor addrs

On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 07:59:36AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:02 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
> <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:32:30PM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> > > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > >
> > > Before the commit 30f241fcf52a ("xsk: Fix immature cq descriptor
> > > production"), there is one issue[1] which causes the wrong publish
> > > of descriptors in race condidtion. The above commit fixes the issue
> > > but adds more memory operations in the xmit hot path and interrupt
> > > context, which can cause side effect in performance.
> > >
> > > This patch tries to propose a new solution to fix the problem
> > > without manipulating the allocation and deallocation of memory. One
> > > of the key points is that I borrowed the idea from the above commit
> > > that postpones updating the ring->descs in xsk_destruct_skb()
> > > instead of in __xsk_generic_xmit().
> > >
> > > The core logics are as show below:
> > > 1. allocate a new local queue. Only its cached_prod member is used.
> > > 2. write the descriptors into the local queue in the xmit path. And
> > >    record the cached_prod as @start_addr that reflects the
> > >    start position of this queue so that later the skb can easily
> > >    find where its addrs are written in the destruction phase.
> > > 3. initialize the upper 24 bits of destructor_arg to store @start_addr
> > >    in xsk_skb_init_misc().
> > > 4. Initialize the lower 8 bits of destructor_arg to store how many
> > >    descriptors the skb owns in xsk_update_num_desc().
> > > 5. write the desc addr(s) from the @start_addr from the cached cq
> > >    one by one into the real cq in xsk_destruct_skb(). In turn sync
> > >    the global state of the cq.
> > >
> > > The format of destructor_arg is designed as:
> > >  ------------------------ --------
> > > |       start_addr       |  num   |
> > >  ------------------------ --------
> > > Using upper 24 bits is enough to keep the temporary descriptors. And
> > > it's also enough to use lower 8 bits to show the number of descriptors
> > > that one skb owns.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250530095957.43248-1-e.kubanski@partner.samsung.com/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > > ---
> > > I posted the series as an RFC because I'd like to hear more opinions on
> > > the current rought approach so that the fix[2] can be avoided and
> > > mitigate the impact of performance. This patch might have bugs because
> > > I decided to spend more time on it after we come to an agreement. Please
> > > review the overall concepts. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Maciej, could you share with me the way you tested jumbo frame? I used
> > > ./xdpsock -i enp2s0f1 -t -q 1 -S -s 9728 but the xdpsock utilizes the
> > > nic more than 90%, which means I cannot see the performance impact.
> 
> Could you provide the command you used? Thanks :)
> 
> > >
> > > [2]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251030140355.4059-1-fmancera@suse.de/
> > > ---
> > >  include/net/xdp_sock.h      |   1 +
> > >  include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h |   1 +
> > >  net/xdp/xsk.c               | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c     |   1 +
> > >  4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > index aa9788f20d0d..6e170107dec7 100644
> > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs,
> > >
> > >       pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp;
> > >       pool->cq = xs->cq_tmp;
> > > +     pool->cached_cq = xs->cached_cq;
> >
> > Jason,
> >
> > pool can be shared between multiple sockets that bind to same <netdev,qid>
> > tuple. I believe here you're opening up for the very same issue Eryk
> > initially reported.
> 
> Actually it shouldn't happen because the cached_cq is more of the
> temporary array that helps the skb store its start position. The
> cached_prod of cached_cq can only be increased, not decreased. In the
> skb destruction phase, only those skbs that go to the end of life need
> to sync its desc from cached_cq to cq. For some skbs that are released
> before the tx completion, we don't need to clear its record in
> cached_cq at all and cq remains untouched.
> 
> To put it in a simple way, the patch you proposed uses kmem_cached*
> helpers to store the addr and write the addr into cq at the end of
> lifecycle while the current patch uses a pre-allocated memory to
> store. So it avoids the allocation and deallocation.
> 
> Unless I'm missing something important. If so, I'm still convinced
> this temporary queue can solve the problem since essentially it's a
> better substitute for kmem cache to retain high performance.

I need a bit more time on this, probably I'll respond tomorrow.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ