[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ae116a5-ede1-427f-bdff-70f1a204a7d6@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 11:07:14 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jacky Chou <jacky_chou@...eedtech.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@...aday-tech.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"taoren@...a.com" <taoren@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add delay
properties for AST2600
On 04/11/2025 10:54, Jacky Chou wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
>>> Create the new compatibles to identify AST2600 MAC0/1 and MAC3/4.
>>> Add conditional schema constraints for Aspeed AST2600 MAC controllers:
>>> - For "aspeed,ast2600-mac01", require rx/tx-internal-delay-ps properties
>>> with 45ps step.
>>> - For "aspeed,ast2600-mac23", require rx/tx-internal-delay-ps properties
>>> with 250ps step.
>>
>> That difference does not justify different compatibles. Basically you said they
>> have same programming model, just different hardware characteristics, so
>> same compatible.
>>
>
> This change was originally based on feedback from a previous review discussion.
> At that time, another reviewer suggested introducing separate compatibles for
> MAC0/1 and MAC2/3 on AST2600, since the delay characteristics differ and they
> might not be fully compatible.
Your commit msg does not provide enough of rationale for that.
Difference in DTS properties is rather a counter argument for having
separate compatibles. That's why you have these properties - to mark the
difference.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists