[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251104-hebamme-sinnieren-a30735196a26@brauner>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:40:36 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] act: use credential guards in acct_write_process()
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 08:04:28AM +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 at 20:27, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > /* Perform file operations on behalf of whoever enabled accounting */
> > - cred = override_creds(file->f_cred);
> > -
> > + with_creds(file->f_cred);
>
> I'd almost prefer if we *only* did "scoped_with_creds()" and didn't
> have this version at all.
>
> Most of the cases want that anyway, and the couple of plain
> "with_creds()" cases look like they would only be cleaned up by making
> the cred scoping more explicit.
>
> What do you think?
Yeah, good idea. I reworked it all so now we're only left with:
scoped_with_creds()
scoped_with_kernel_creds()
It increases the indentation for about 3 cases but otherwise is safer.
It's all in:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=kernel-6.19.cred
Powered by blists - more mailing lists