[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bvzstd363kuvzfnxg6r3dfxtkqswcdz677rpvutgugfep5ecsx@6rlyaud34g7e>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:25:47 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/12] selftests/vsock: reuse logic for
vsock_test through wrapper functions
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 02:38:53PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
>Add wrapper functions vm_vsock_test() and host_vsock_test() to invoke
>the vsock_test binary. This encapsulates several items of repeat logic,
>such as waiting for the server to reach listening state and
>enabling/disabling the bash option pipefail to avoid pipe-style logging
>from hiding failures.
>
>Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>---
> tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>index da0408ca6895..03dc4717ac3b 100755
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>@@ -273,7 +273,77 @@ EOF
>
> host_wait_for_listener() {
> wait_for_listener "${TEST_HOST_PORT_LISTENER}" "${WAIT_PERIOD}" "${WAIT_PERIOD_MAX}"
>+}
>+
>+vm_vsock_test() {
>+ local host=$1
>+ local cid=$2
>+ local port=$3
>+ local rc
>+
>+ # log output and use pipefail to respect vsock_test errors
>+ set -o pipefail
>+ if [[ "${host}" != server ]]; then
>+ vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>+ --mode=client \
>+ --control-host="${host}" \
>+ --peer-cid="${cid}" \
>+ --control-port="${port}" \
>+ 2>&1 | log_guest
>+ rc=$?
>+ else
>+ vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>+ --mode=server \
>+ --peer-cid="${cid}" \
>+ --control-port="${port}" \
>+ 2>&1 | log_guest &
>+ rc=$?
>+
>+ if [[ $rc -ne 0 ]]; then
>+ set +o pipefail
>+ return $rc
>+ fi
>+
>+ vm_wait_for_listener "${port}"
>+ rc=$?
>+ fi
>+ set +o pipefail
>
>+ return $rc
>+}
>+
>+host_vsock_test() {
>+ local host=$1
>+ local cid=$2
>+ local port=$3
>+ local rc
>+
>+ # log output and use pipefail to respect vsock_test errors
>+ set -o pipefail
>+ if [[ "${host}" != server ]]; then
>+ ${VSOCK_TEST} \
>+ --mode=client \
>+ --peer-cid="${cid}" \
>+ --control-host="${host}" \
>+ --control-port="${port}" 2>&1 | log_host
>+ rc=$?
>+ else
>+ ${VSOCK_TEST} \
>+ --mode=server \
>+ --peer-cid="${cid}" \
>+ --control-port="${port}" 2>&1 | log_host &
>+ rc=$?
>+
>+ if [[ $rc -ne 0 ]]; then
>+ return $rc
>+ fi
>+
>+ host_wait_for_listener "${port}" "${WAIT_PERIOD}" "${WAIT_PERIOD_MAX}"
IIUC host_wait_for_listener() doesn't have any input parameter, should
we add them if we need to call in this way?
Stefano
>+ rc=$?
>+ fi
>+ set +o pipefail
>+
>+ return $rc
> }
>
> log() {
>@@ -312,59 +382,41 @@ log_guest() {
> }
>
> test_vm_server_host_client() {
>+ if ! vm_vsock_test "server" 2 "${TEST_GUEST_PORT}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>- --mode=server \
>- --control-port="${TEST_GUEST_PORT}" \
>- --peer-cid=2 \
>- 2>&1 | log_guest &
>-
>- vm_wait_for_listener "${TEST_GUEST_PORT}"
>-
>- ${VSOCK_TEST} \
>- --mode=client \
>- --control-host=127.0.0.1 \
>- --peer-cid="${VSOCK_CID}" \
>- --control-port="${TEST_HOST_PORT}" 2>&1 | log_host
>+ if ! host_vsock_test "127.0.0.1" "${VSOCK_CID}" "${TEST_HOST_PORT}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- return $?
>+ return "${KSFT_PASS}"
> }
>
> test_vm_client_host_server() {
>+ if ! host_vsock_test "server" "${VSOCK_CID}" "${TEST_HOST_PORT_LISTENER}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- ${VSOCK_TEST} \
>- --mode "server" \
>- --control-port "${TEST_HOST_PORT_LISTENER}" \
>- --peer-cid "${VSOCK_CID}" 2>&1 | log_host &
>-
>- host_wait_for_listener
>-
>- vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>- --mode=client \
>- --control-host=10.0.2.2 \
>- --peer-cid=2 \
>- --control-port="${TEST_HOST_PORT_LISTENER}" 2>&1 | log_guest
>+ if ! vm_vsock_test "10.0.2.2" 2 "${TEST_HOST_PORT_LISTENER}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- return $?
>+ return "${KSFT_PASS}"
> }
>
> test_vm_loopback() {
> local port=60000 # non-forwarded local port
>
>- vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>- --mode=server \
>- --control-port="${port}" \
>- --peer-cid=1 2>&1 | log_guest &
>-
>- vm_wait_for_listener "${port}"
>+ if ! vm_vsock_test "server" 1 "${port}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- vm_ssh -- "${VSOCK_TEST}" \
>- --mode=client \
>- --control-host="127.0.0.1" \
>- --control-port="${port}" \
>- --peer-cid=1 2>&1 | log_guest
>+ if ! vm_vsock_test "127.0.0.1" 1 "${port}"; then
>+ return "${KSFT_FAIL}"
>+ fi
>
>- return $?
>+ return "${KSFT_PASS}"
> }
>
> run_test() {
>
>--
>2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists