[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAnhhDn=2qDCKXf3Xnz8VTDG0HOXW8x=GSdtHUe+qipvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 08:19:14 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Lei Yang <leiyang@...hat.com>
Cc: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>, Gavi Teitz <gavi@...dia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7] virtio-net: fix received length check in big packets
Hi Lei,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 12:56 AM Lei Yang <leiyang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Tested this patch with virtio-net regression tests, everything works fine.
I saw you mentioned various tests on virtio_net multiple times. Could
you share your tools with me, I wonder? AFAIK, the stability of such
benchmarks is not usually static, so I'm interested.
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists