lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQwJLKka-_pBGq_g@fedora>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 02:34:20 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
	"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>,
	Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
	Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
	Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] netlink: specs: update rt-rule src/dst
 attribute types to support IPv4 addresses

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 04:13:19PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:55:47 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > > I just realize that most of the address/src/dst in rt-addr/route are
> > > > dual stack. The same with FRA_DST. We can't simply change binary to u32.
> > > > So can we keep this u32 -> binary change?  
> > > 
> > > Ah, should have looked at more context..
> > > Yes, and in that case without the display-hint?  
> > 
> > The display-hint is required; otherwise, the displayed src and dst fields
> > appear as binary data, and setting the rule’s src/dst values also fails. I
> > haven’t checked the code yet, but with
> >   - display-hint: ipv4
> > the IPv6 addresses are also displayed correctly :)
> 
> Heh, we should have called the hint "ip" in that case :)

I saw the display hit supports "ipv4-or-v6", but genetlink-c.yaml doesn't
have "ipv4-or-v6". Do you know why?

# grep -rn fddi Documentation/netlink
Documentation/netlink/genetlink.yaml:188:                enum: [ hex, mac, fddi, ipv4, ipv6, uuid ]
Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml:157:                enum: [ hex, mac, fddi, ipv4, ipv6, ipv4-or-v6, uuid ]
Documentation/netlink/netlink-raw.yaml:160:                enum: [ hex, mac, fddi, ipv4, ipv6, uuid ]
Documentation/netlink/genetlink-c.yaml:230:                enum: [ hex, mac, fddi, ipv4, ipv6, uuid ]

Thanks
Hangbin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ