lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80576ce0-7383-4b46-bd3a-3ecb0837007e@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:10:58 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix mii_status when slave is down

Le 07/11/2025 à 03:36, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> netif_carrier_ok() doesn't check if the slave is up. Before the below
>> commit, netif_running() was also checked.
> 
> I assume you have a device which is reporting carrier, despite being
> admin down? That is pretty unusual, and suggests its PHY handing is
> broken. What device is it? You might want to also fix it.
Yes, one slave is put down administratively. Before the mentioned commit, the
status was correctly reported; it's no longer the case.
It's a regression.

Thanks,
Nicolas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ