netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] netconsole: Simplify send_fragmented

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s6zjlx2geyjlfwgp2rvw2qolgu6vnsstv5y2rdihxwkt5i45nb@y6jzzo5pvgge>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 04:15:30 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@...il.com>
Cc: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] netconsole: Simplify send_fragmented_body()

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 09:06:43AM -0800, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote:
> Refactor send_fragmented_body() to use separate offset tracking for
> msgbody, and extradata instead of complex conditional logic.
> The previous implementation used boolean flags and calculated offsets
> which made the code harder to follow.
> 
> The new implementation maintains independent offset counters
> (msgbody_offset, extradata_offset) and processes each section
> sequentially, making the data flow more straightforward and the code
> easier to maintain.
> 
> This is a preparatory refactoring with no functional changes, which will
> allow easily splitting extradata_complete into separate userdata and
> sysdata buffers in the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/netconsole.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 5d8d0214786c..0a8ba7c4bc9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -1553,13 +1553,16 @@ static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt,
>  				 const char *msgbody, int header_len,
>  				 int msgbody_len, int extradata_len)
>  {
> -	int sent_extradata, preceding_bytes;
>  	const char *extradata = NULL;
>  	int body_len, offset = 0;
> +	int extradata_offset = 0;
> +	int msgbody_offset = 0;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC
>  	extradata = nt->extradata_complete;
>  #endif


extradata could be NULL at this time if CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC is
unset. Basically extradata=NULL will not be replaced.

> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!extradata && extradata_len != 0))
> +		return;

And entradata_len = 0 for CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC disabled.

> +		/* write msgbody first */
> +		this_chunk = min(msgbody_len - msgbody_offset,
> +				 MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header);
> +		memcpy(nt->buf + this_header, msgbody + msgbody_offset,
> +		       this_chunk);
> +		msgbody_offset += this_chunk;
> +		this_offset += this_chunk;
> +
> +		/* after msgbody, append extradata */
> +		this_chunk = min(extradata_len - extradata_offset,
> +				 MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header - this_offset);
> +		memcpy(nt->buf + this_header + this_offset,
> +		       extradata + extradata_offset, this_chunk);

then you are going to memcpy from NULL pointer (`extradata + extradata_offset` == 0).

I got this my vim LSP that printed:

	Null pointer passed as 2nd argument to memory copy function [unix.cstring.NullArg]