[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ4LaUi9wTnEN8KA@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:08:25 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] selftests/vsock: avoid multi-VM
pidfile collisions with QEMU
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
...
> @@ -90,15 +85,19 @@ vm_ssh() {
> }
>
> cleanup() {
> - if [[ -s "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" ]]; then
> - pkill -SIGTERM -F "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> - fi
> + local pidfile
>
> - # If failure occurred during or before qemu start up, then we need
> - # to clean this up ourselves.
> - if [[ -e "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" ]]; then
> - rm "${QEMU_PIDFILE}"
> - fi
> + for pidfile in "${PIDFILES[@]}"; do
> + if [[ -s "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> + pkill -SIGTERM -F "${pidfile}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> + fi
> +
> + # If failure occurred during or before qemu start up, then we need
> + # to clean this up ourselves.
> + if [[ -e "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> + rm "${pidfile}"
> + fi
> + done
> }
Hi Bobby,
This is completely untested, but it looks to me
like cleanup() could be implemented more succinctly like this.
cleanup() {
terminate_pidfiles "${PIDFILES[@]}"
}
>
> check_args() {
> @@ -188,10 +187,35 @@ handle_build() {
> popd &>/dev/null
> }
>
> +create_pidfile() {
> + local pidfile
> +
> + pidfile=$(mktemp "${PIDFILE_TEMPLATE}")
> + PIDFILES+=("${pidfile}")
> +
> + echo "${pidfile}"
> +}
> +
> +terminate_pidfiles() {
> + local pidfile
> +
> + for pidfile in "$@"; do
> + if [[ -s "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> + pkill -SIGTERM -F "${pidfile}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> + fi
> +
> + if [[ -e "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> + rm -f "${pidfile}"
> + fi
> + done
I think it would be useful to remove $pidfile from $PIDFILES.
This might be easier to implement if PIDFILES was an associative array.
> +}
> +
...
> @@ -498,7 +529,8 @@ handle_build
> echo "1..${#ARGS[@]}"
>
> log_host "Booting up VM"
> -vm_start
> +pidfile="$(create_pidfile)"
> +vm_start "${pidfile}"
> vm_wait_for_ssh
> log_host "VM booted up"
>
> @@ -522,6 +554,8 @@ for arg in "${ARGS[@]}"; do
> cnt_total=$(( cnt_total + 1 ))
> done
>
> +terminate_pidfiles "${pidfile}"
I am assuming that there will be more calls to terminate_pidfiles
in subsequent patch-sets.
Else I think terminate_pidfiles can be removed
and instead we can rely on cleanup().
> +
> echo "SUMMARY: PASS=${cnt_pass} SKIP=${cnt_skip} FAIL=${cnt_fail}"
> echo "Log: ${LOG}"
>
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists