[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877bw1ooa7.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:28:16 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 5/5] net: dev_queue_xmit() llist adoption
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> writes:
> Remove busylock spinlock and use a lockless list (llist)
> to reduce spinlock contention to the minimum.
>
> Idea is that only one cpu might spin on the qdisc spinlock,
> while others simply add their skb in the llist.
>
> After this patch, we get a 300 % improvement on heavy TX workloads.
> - Sending twice the number of packets per second.
> - While consuming 50 % less cycles.
>
> Note that this also allows in the future to submit batches
> to various qdisc->enqueue() methods.
>
> Tested:
>
> - Dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6985P-C (480 hyper threads).
> - 100Gbit NIC, 30 TX queues with FQ packet scheduler.
> - echo 64 >/sys/kernel/slab/skbuff_small_head/cpu_partial (avoid contention in mm)
> - 240 concurrent "netperf -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 120 -n"
Hi Eric
While testing this with sch_cake (to get a new baseline for the mq_cake
patches as Jamal suggested), I found that this patch completely destroys
the performance of cake in particular.
I run a small UDP test (64-byte packets across 16 flows through
xdp-trafficgen, offered load is ~5Mpps) with a single cake instance on
as the root interface qdisc.
With a stock Fedora (6.17.7) kernel, this gets me around 630 Kpps across
8 queues (on an E810-C, ice driver):
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 40321218 ( 40,321,218) <= tx_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 42841424 ( 42,841,424) <= tx_bytes.nic /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5248505 ( 5,248,505) <= tx_queue_0_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82008 ( 82,008) <= tx_queue_0_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 3425984 ( 3,425,984) <= tx_queue_1_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 53531 ( 53,531) <= tx_queue_1_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5277496 ( 5,277,496) <= tx_queue_2_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82461 ( 82,461) <= tx_queue_2_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5285736 ( 5,285,736) <= tx_queue_3_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82590 ( 82,590) <= tx_queue_3_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5280731 ( 5,280,731) <= tx_queue_4_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82511 ( 82,511) <= tx_queue_4_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5275665 ( 5,275,665) <= tx_queue_5_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82432 ( 82,432) <= tx_queue_5_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5276398 ( 5,276,398) <= tx_queue_6_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82444 ( 82,444) <= tx_queue_6_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 5250946 ( 5,250,946) <= tx_queue_7_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 82046 ( 82,046) <= tx_queue_7_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1 ( 1) <= tx_restart /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 630023 ( 630,023) <= tx_size_127.nic /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 630019 ( 630,019) <= tx_unicast /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 630020 ( 630,020) <= tx_unicast.nic /sec
However, running the same test on a net-next kernel, performance drops
to round 10 Kpps(!):
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 679003 ( 679,003) <= tx_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 721440 ( 721,440) <= tx_bytes.nic /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 123539 ( 123,539) <= tx_queue_0_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1930 ( 1,930) <= tx_queue_0_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1776 ( 1,776) <= tx_queue_1_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 28 ( 28) <= tx_queue_1_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1837 ( 1,837) <= tx_queue_2_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 29 ( 29) <= tx_queue_2_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1776 ( 1,776) <= tx_queue_3_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 28 ( 28) <= tx_queue_3_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 1654 ( 1,654) <= tx_queue_4_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 26 ( 26) <= tx_queue_4_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 222026 ( 222,026) <= tx_queue_5_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 3469 ( 3,469) <= tx_queue_5_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 183072 ( 183,072) <= tx_queue_6_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 2861 ( 2,861) <= tx_queue_6_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 143322 ( 143,322) <= tx_queue_7_bytes /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 2239 ( 2,239) <= tx_queue_7_packets /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 10609 ( 10,609) <= tx_size_127.nic /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 10609 ( 10,609) <= tx_unicast /sec
Ethtool(ice0p1 ) stat: 10609 ( 10,609) <= tx_unicast.nic /sec
Reverting commit 100dfa74cad9 ("net: dev_queue_xmit() llist adoption")
(and the followon f8a55d5e71e6 ("net: add a fast path in
__netif_schedule()"), but that alone makes no difference) gets me back
to the previous 630-650 Kpps range.
I couldn't find any other qdisc that suffers in the same way (tried
fq_codel, sfq and netem as single root qdiscs), so this seems to be some
specific interaction between the llist implementation and sch_cake. Any
idea what could be causing this?
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists