netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next v9 2/3] net: netfilter: Add IPIP flowtable tx sw acceleration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aRSDjkzMx4Ba7IW8@calendula>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:55:00 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v9 2/3] net: netfilter: Add IPIP flowtable tx sw
 acceleration

Hi Lorenzo,

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
[...]
> @@ -565,8 +622,9 @@ nf_flow_offload_ip_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  
>  	dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
>  	flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> +	other_tuple = &flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple;
>  
> -	if (nf_flow_encap_push(skb, &flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple) < 0)
> +	if (nf_flow_encap_push(state->net, skb, other_tuple))
>  		return NF_DROP;
>  
>  	switch (tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type) {
> @@ -577,7 +635,9 @@ nf_flow_offload_ip_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			flow_offload_teardown(flow);
>  			return NF_DROP;
>  		}
> -		neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(rt->dst.dev, rt_nexthop(rt, flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src_v4.s_addr));
> +		dest = other_tuple->tun_num ? other_tuple->tun.src_v4.s_addr
> +					    : other_tuple->src_v4.s_addr;

I think this can be simplified if my series use the ip_hdr(skb)->daddr
for rt_nexthop(), see attached patch. This would be fetched _before_
pushing the tunnel and layer 2 encapsulation headers. Then, there is
no need to fetch other_tuple and check if tun_num is greater than
zero.

See my sketch patch, I am going to give this a try, if this is
correct, I would need one more iteration from you.

View attachment "update.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1101 bytes)