[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251112-gainful-sturdy-bird-296956-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:17:01 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...tq-group.com>,
Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/11] can: mcp251xfd: add workaround for errata
5
On 12.11.2025 09:28:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:13:47 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > +static int
> > +mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context,
> > + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len,
> > + const void *val, size_t val_len)
> > +{
> > + const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON +
> > + mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK);
>
> Looks like this is added by the next patch :(
>
> drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c:48:59: error: ‘MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO0’?
> 48 | mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO0
>
> Do you do rebases or do we have to take it as is?
I'll fix it and send a new PR.
Sorry for the noise,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists