lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87346ijbs9.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:35:18 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>, security@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net, bestswngs@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net/sched: sch_cake: Fix incorrect qlen
 reduction in cake_drop

Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu> writes:

> There is still one problem I am not very sure since I am not very 
> experienced with cake and gso. It's about the gso branch [1]. The slen 
> is the lenth added to the cake sch and that branch uses 
> `qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1-numsegs, len-slen);` to inform the 
> parent sched. However, when we drop the packet, it could be probmatic 
> since we should reduce slen instead of len. Is this a potential
> problem?

Hmm, no I think it's fine? The qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1-numsegs,
len-slen) *increases* the backlog with the difference between the
original length and the number of new segments. And then we *decrease*
the backlog with the number of bytes we dropped.

The compensation we're doing is for the backlog update of the parent,
which is still using the original packet length regardless of any
splitting, so that doesn't change the compensation value.

-Toke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ