[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871pm126fv.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:22:44 -0800
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Tony Nguyen
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Sebastian Andrzej
Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] igc: Restore default Qbv schedule when
changing channels
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Wed Nov 12 2025, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> writes:
>>
>>> The MQPRIO (and ETF) offload utilizes the TSN Tx mode. This mode is always
>>> coupled to Qbv. Therefore, the driver sets a default Qbv schedule of all gates
>>> opened and a cycle time of 1s. This schedule is set during probe.
>>>
>>> However, the following sequence of events lead to Tx issues:
>>>
>>> - Boot a dual core system
>>> probe():
>>> igc_tsn_clear_schedule():
>>> -> Default Schedule is set
>>> Note: At this point the driver has allocated two Tx/Rx queues, because
>>> there are only two CPU(s).
>>>
>>> - ethtool -L enp3s0 combined 4
>>> igc_ethtool_set_channels():
>>> igc_reinit_queues()
>>> -> Default schedule is gone, per Tx ring start and end time are zero
>>>
>>> - tc qdisc replace dev enp3s0 handle 100 parent root mqprio \
>>> num_tc 4 map 3 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 \
>>> queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 hw 1
>>> igc_tsn_offload_apply():
>>> igc_tsn_enable_offload():
>>> -> Writes zeros to IGC_STQT(i) and IGC_ENDQT(i) -> Boom
>>>
>>> Therefore, restore the default Qbv schedule after changing the amount of
>>> channels.
>>>
>>
>> Couple of questions:
>> - Would it make sense to mark this patch as a fix?
>
> This only happens if a user uses ETF or MQPRIO and a dual/single core
> system. So I didn't see the need to mark it as a fix.
>
I still think this is fix material. People can always run stuff in VMs,
and it makes it easier to have single/dual core systems.
>>
>> - What would happen if the user added a Qbv schedule (not the default
>> one) and then changed the number of queues? My concern is that 'tc
>> qdisc' would show the custom user schedule and the hardware would be
>> "running" the default schedule, this inconsistency is not ideal. In
>> any case, it would be a separate patch.
>
> Excellent point. Honestly I'm not sure what to expect when changing the
> number of queues after a user Qbv schedule is added. For MQPRIO we added
> a restriction [1] especially for that case. I'm leaning towards the same
> solution here. What do you think?
Sounds great. Avoiding getting into inconsistent states is better than
trying to fix it later.
>
> Thanks,
> Kurt
>
> [1] - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc5/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c#L1564
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists