[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251115020935.2643121-3-kuniyu@google.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 02:08:33 +0000
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/7] af_unix: Simplify GC state.
GC manages its state by two variables, unix_graph_maybe_cyclic
and unix_graph_grouped, both of which are set to false in the
initial state.
When an AF_UNIX socket is passed to an in-flight AF_UNIX socket,
unix_update_graph() sets unix_graph_maybe_cyclic to true and
unix_graph_grouped to false, making the next GC invocation call
unix_walk_scc() to group SCCs.
Once unix_walk_scc() finishes, sockets in the same SCC are linked
via vertex->scc_entry. Then, unix_graph_grouped is set to true
so that the following GC invocations can skip Tarjan's algorithm
and simply iterate through the list in unix_walk_scc_fast().
In addition, if we know there is at least one cyclic reference,
we set unix_graph_maybe_cyclic to true so that we do not skip GC.
So the state transitions as follows:
(unix_graph_maybe_cyclic, unix_graph_grouped)
=
(false, false) -> (true, false) -> (true, true) or (false, true)
^.______________/________________/
There is no transition to the initial state where both variables
are false.
If we consider the initial state as grouped, we can see that the
GC actually has a tristate.
Let's consolidate two variables into one enum.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
---
net/unix/garbage.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 9f62d5097973..7528e2db1293 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -121,8 +121,13 @@ static struct unix_vertex *unix_edge_successor(struct unix_edge *edge)
return edge->successor->vertex;
}
-static bool unix_graph_maybe_cyclic;
-static bool unix_graph_grouped;
+enum {
+ UNIX_GRAPH_NOT_CYCLIC,
+ UNIX_GRAPH_MAYBE_CYCLIC,
+ UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC,
+};
+
+static unsigned char unix_graph_state;
static void unix_update_graph(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
{
@@ -132,8 +137,7 @@ static void unix_update_graph(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
if (!vertex)
return;
- unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = true;
- unix_graph_grouped = false;
+ unix_graph_state = UNIX_GRAPH_MAYBE_CYCLIC;
}
static LIST_HEAD(unix_unvisited_vertices);
@@ -536,8 +540,7 @@ static void unix_walk_scc(struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
swap(unix_vertex_unvisited_index, unix_vertex_grouped_index);
unix_graph_cyclic_sccs = cyclic_sccs;
- unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = !!unix_graph_cyclic_sccs;
- unix_graph_grouped = true;
+ unix_graph_state = cyclic_sccs ? UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC : UNIX_GRAPH_NOT_CYCLIC;
}
static void unix_walk_scc_fast(struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
@@ -570,7 +573,7 @@ static void unix_walk_scc_fast(struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
list_replace_init(&unix_visited_vertices, &unix_unvisited_vertices);
unix_graph_cyclic_sccs = cyclic_sccs;
- unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = !!unix_graph_cyclic_sccs;
+ unix_graph_state = cyclic_sccs ? UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC : UNIX_GRAPH_NOT_CYCLIC;
}
static bool gc_in_progress;
@@ -582,14 +585,14 @@ static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work)
spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
- if (!unix_graph_maybe_cyclic) {
+ if (unix_graph_state == UNIX_GRAPH_NOT_CYCLIC) {
spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
goto skip_gc;
}
__skb_queue_head_init(&hitlist);
- if (unix_graph_grouped)
+ if (unix_graph_state == UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC)
unix_walk_scc_fast(&hitlist);
else
unix_walk_scc(&hitlist);
--
2.52.0.rc1.455.g30608eb744-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists