lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2cy5inty1.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 10:38:30 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,  Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
  Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
  Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,  Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
  Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
 <ast@...erby.net>,  Stanislav Fomichev
 <sdf@...ichev.me>,  Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,  Guillaume Nault
 <gnault@...hat.com>,  Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,  Petr Machata
 <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 3/3] tools: ynl: add YNL test framework

Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org> writes:

> Hi Donald,
>
> On 14/11/2025 12:46, Donald Hunter wrote:
>> Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:
>>>
>>> +cleanup() {
>>> +	if [[ -n "$testns" ]]; then
>>> +		ip netns exec "$testns" bash -c "echo $NSIM_ID > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" 2>/dev/null || true
>>> +		ip netns del "$testns" 2>/dev/null || true
>>> +	fi
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +# Check if ynl command is available
>>> +if ! command -v $ynl &>/dev/null && [[ ! -x $ynl ]]; then
>>> +	ktap_skip_all "ynl command not found: $ynl"
>>> +	exit "$KSFT_SKIP"
>>> +fi
>>> +
>>> +trap cleanup EXIT
>>> +
>>> +ktap_print_header
>>> +ktap_set_plan 9>> +setup
>>> +
>>> +# Run all tests
>>> +cli_list_families
>>> +cli_netdev_ops
>>> +cli_ethtool_ops
>>> +cli_rt_route_ops
>>> +cli_rt_addr_ops
>>> +cli_rt_link_ops
>>> +cli_rt_neigh_ops
>>> +cli_rt_rule_ops
>>> +cli_nlctrl_ops
>>> +
>>> +ktap_finished
>> 
>> minor nit: ktap_finished should probably be in the 'cleanup' trap handler
>
> @Donald: I don't think 'ktap_finished' should be called there: in case
> of errors with an early exit during the setup phase, the two scripts
> will call 'ktap_skip_all', then 'exit "$KSFT_SKIP"'. If 'ktap_finished'
> is called in the 'cleanup' trap, it will print a total with everything
> set to 0 and call 'exit' again with other values (and no effects). So I
> think it is not supposed to be called from the exit trap.

Okay, fair. I thought the goal was to always output totals. Looking at
ktap_helpers.sh I see that it can't output a meaningful skip count for
the skip_call case.

>
> Cheers,
> Matt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ