[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7200954-ce62-42fe-853a-49127b2f129d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 03:35:00 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...ux.dev>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com,
syzbot+2a6fbf0f0530375968df@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>,
MPTCP Linux <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] mptcp: fix a race in mptcp_pm_del_add_timer()
Hi Jakub,
Thank you for your reply!
18 Nov 2025 02:05:12 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:42:31 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>>> Out of curiosity, is it not OK to reply to the patch with the new
>>>> Reported-by & Closes tags to have them automatically added when applying
>>>> the patch? (I was going to do that on the v1, then I saw the v2 just
>>>> when I was going to press 'Send' :) )
>>>
>>> I am not sure patchwork has been finally changed to understand these two tags.
>>
>> Ah yes, thank you! If there is a dependence on Patchwork, I think
>> indeed, it doesn't recognise the 'Closes' tag (but I think 'Reported-by'
>> is OK).
>>
>> While at it, I forgot to add: this patch can be applied in net directly.
>
> FWIW I have a local script which extracts them from patchwork comments
> and applies them (same for Fixes tags).
Great, good to know, thanks!
(So similar to what "b4 shazam -Msl" would do then.)
> But it's always safer to resend.
Indeed.
Cheers,
Matt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists