[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251119024647-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 02:53:36 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, parav@...dia.com,
shshitrit@...dia.com, yohadt@...dia.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, kevin.tian@...el.com,
kuba@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 05/12] virtio_net: Query and set flow filter
caps
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 08:38:55AM -0600, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> +/**
> + * struct virtio_net_ff_cap_data - Flow filter resource capability limits
> + * @groups_limit: maximum number of flow filter groups supported by the device
> + * @classifiers_limit: maximum number of classifiers supported by the device
> + * @rules_limit: maximum number of rules supported device-wide across all groups
> + * @rules_per_group_limit: maximum number of rules allowed in a single group
> + * @last_rule_priority: priority value associated with the lowest-priority rule
> + * @selectors_per_classifier_limit: maximum selectors allowed in one classifier
> + *
> + * The limits are reported by the device and describe resource capacities for
> + * flow filters.
This sentence adds nothing of substance.
Pls don't add fluff like this in comments.
> Multi-byte fields are little-endian.
You do not really need to say "Multi-byte fields are little-endian."
do you? It says __le explicitly. Same applies to all structures.
> + */
> +struct virtio_net_ff_cap_data {
> + __le32 groups_limit;
> + __le32 classifiers_limit;
> + __le32 rules_limit;
> + __le32 rules_per_group_limit;
> + __u8 last_rule_priority;
> + __u8 selectors_per_classifier_limit;
> +};
so the compiler adds 2 bytes of padding here. The bug is
in the spec.
I think this happens to work for people because controllers
either also added 2 bytes of padding here at the end,
or they report a shorter structure and
the spec says commands can be truncated.
So I think we can just add 2 bytes of padding at the end
and it will be harmless.
It is a spec extension, but a minor one.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists