[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176352302649.209489.15960953294481237254.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 03:30:26 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@...e.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
g.djavadyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static
route
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:59:38 +0100 you wrote:
> When an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) is received for a prefix, the
> kernel creates the corresponding on-link route with flags RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT configured and RTF_EXPIRES if lifetime is set.
>
> If later a user configures a static IPv6 address on the same prefix the
> kernel clears the RTF_EXPIRES flag but it doesn't clear the RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT. When the next RA for that prefix is received, the
> kernel sees the route as RA-learned and wrongly configures back the
> lifetime. This is problematic because if the route expires, the static
> address won't have the corresponding on-link route.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [1/2,net-next,v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f72514b3c569
- [2/2,net-next,v2] selftests: fib_tests: add fib6 from ra to static test
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d7dbda878920
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists