[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSBjbqQtQFgRTDS0@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:04:46 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath: wil6210: fix a bunch of kernel-doc warnings
On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 06:02:13PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> scripts/kernel-doc.py reports 51 kernel-doc warnings in wil6210.h.
> Fix all kernel-doc warnings reported in wil6210.h.
>
> Several comments are changed from "/**" to "/*" since it appears that
> "/**" was used for many non-kernel-doc comments.
>
> - add kernel-doc for missing function parameters
> - add one function "Returns:"
> - correct kernel-doc struct name to match actual struct name in 2 places
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
...
> @@ -444,8 +444,7 @@ static inline u8 mk_cidxtid(u8 cid, u8 t
> * parse_cidxtid - parse @cidxtid field
> * @cid: store CID value here
> * @tid: store TID value here
> - *
> - * @cidxtid field encoded as bits 0..3 - CID; 4..7 - TID
> + * @cidxtid: field encoded as bits 0..3 - CID; 4..7 - TID
Hi Randy,
I wonder if it would make sense to move the @cidxtid line
so it is above the @cid line. In which case the order of
the documentation of the parameters would match their order
in the subject.
But either way, this patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> */
> static inline void parse_cidxtid(u8 cidxtid, u8 *cid, u8 *tid)
> {
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists