[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251124-skb-meta-safeproof-netdevs-rx-only-v1-11-8978f5054417@cloudflare.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:28:47 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 11/15] bpf, verifier: Remove side effects from
may_access_direct_pkt_data
The may_access_direct_pkt_data() helper sets env->seen_direct_write as a
side effect, which creates awkward calling patterns:
- check_special_kfunc() has a comment warning readers about the side effect
- specialize_kfunc() must save and restore the flag around the call
Make the helper a pure function by moving the seen_direct_write flag
setting to call sites that need it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ff40e5e65c43..64a04b7dd500 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6085,13 +6085,9 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (meta)
return meta->pkt_access;
- env->seen_direct_write = true;
return true;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT:
- if (t == BPF_WRITE)
- env->seen_direct_write = true;
-
return true;
default:
@@ -7619,15 +7615,17 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
err = check_stack_write(env, regno, off, size,
value_regno, insn_idx);
} else if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(reg)) {
- if (t == BPF_WRITE && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, t)) {
- verbose(env, "cannot write into packet\n");
- return -EACCES;
- }
- if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
- is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
- verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into packet\n",
- value_regno);
- return -EACCES;
+ if (t == BPF_WRITE) {
+ if (!may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, BPF_WRITE)) {
+ verbose(env, "cannot write into packet\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (value_regno >= 0 && is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
+ verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into packet\n",
+ value_regno);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ env->seen_direct_write = true;
}
err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size, false);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
@@ -13766,11 +13764,11 @@ static int check_special_kfunc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_ca
if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice]) {
regs[BPF_REG_0].type |= MEM_RDONLY;
} else {
- /* this will set env->seen_direct_write to true */
if (!may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, BPF_WRITE)) {
verbose(env, "the prog does not allow writes to packet data\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ env->seen_direct_write = true;
}
if (!meta->initialized_dynptr.id) {
@@ -21810,7 +21808,6 @@ static void specialize_kfunc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u32 func_id, u16 offset, unsigned long *addr)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
- bool seen_direct_write;
void *xdp_kfunc;
bool is_rdonly;
@@ -21827,16 +21824,10 @@ static void specialize_kfunc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return;
if (func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_from_skb]) {
- seen_direct_write = env->seen_direct_write;
is_rdonly = !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, BPF_WRITE);
if (is_rdonly)
*addr = (unsigned long)bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly;
-
- /* restore env->seen_direct_write to its original value, since
- * may_access_direct_pkt_data mutates it
- */
- env->seen_direct_write = seen_direct_write;
}
if (func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_set_dentry_xattr] &&
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists