[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251124160517-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:05:51 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, parav@...dia.com,
shshitrit@...dia.com, yohadt@...dia.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, kevin.tian@...el.com,
kuba@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 07/12] virtio_net: Implement layer 2 ethtool
flow rules
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 01:15:18PM -0600, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> @@ -5681,6 +5710,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
> .get_rxfh_fields = virtnet_get_hashflow,
> .set_rxfh_fields = virtnet_set_hashflow,
> .get_rx_ring_count = virtnet_get_rx_ring_count,
> + .set_rxnfc = virtnet_set_rxnfc,
> };
>
> static void virtnet_get_queue_stats_rx(struct net_device *dev, int i,
should we not wire up get_rxnfc too? weird to be able to set but
not get.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists