[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc97cb0e-628c-4a97-98ca-06ececf32e1e@samba.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:36:26 +0100
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] io_uring: Introduce getsockname io_uring cmd
Hi Gabriel,
> +static int io_uring_cmd_getsockname(struct socket *sock,
> + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = cmd->sqe;
> + struct sockaddr __user *uaddr;
> + unsigned int peer;
> + int __user *ulen;
> +
> + if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->__pad1 || sqe->len || sqe->rw_flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + uaddr = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> + ulen = u64_to_user_ptr(sqe->addr3);
> + peer = READ_ONCE(sqe->optlen);
> + if (peer > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return do_getsockname(sock, 0, uaddr, ulen);
I guess this should actually pass down 'peer' instead of '0'?
metze
Powered by blists - more mailing lists