[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaOM2GL+ieYyvTr9Gp6YC7e1GDfjHb42X7zb5Gs3ChtiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:54:12 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, tj@...nel.org, martin.lau@...nel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/6] bpf: Allow verifier to fixup kernel
module kfuncs
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 3:13 PM Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Allow verifier to fixup kfuncs in kernel module to support kfuncs with
> __prog arguments. Currently, special kfuncs and kfuncs with __prog
> arguments are kernel kfuncs. Allowing kernel module kfuncs should not
> affect existing kfunc fixup as kernel module kfuncs have BTF IDs greater
> than kernel kfuncs' BTF IDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 098dd7f21c89..182d63b075af 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -22432,8 +22432,7 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
>
> if (!bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call())
> insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(desc->addr);
> - if (insn->off)
> - return 0;
> +
> if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_obj_new_impl] ||
> desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl]) {
> struct btf_struct_meta *kptr_struct_meta = env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].kptr_struct_meta;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists