| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20251126104225.1779639-1-metze@samba.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:42:25 +0100
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
To: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: metze@...ba.org,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: reclassify sockets in order to avoid false positives from lockdep
While developing IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT support for the code
under fs/smb/common/smbdirect [1], I noticed false positives like this:
[+0,003927] ============================================
[+0,000532] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[+0,000611] 6.18.0-rc5-metze-kasan-lockdep.02+ #1 Tainted: G OE
[+0,000835] --------------------------------------------
[+0,000729] ksmbd:r5445/3609 is trying to acquire lock:
[+0,000709] ffff88800b9570f8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360
[+0,000831]
but task is already holding lock:
[+0,000684] ffff88800654af78 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: smbdirect_sk_close+0x122/0x790 [smbdirect]
[+0,000928]
other info that might help us debug this:
[+0,005552] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[+0,000723] CPU0
[+0,000359] ----
[+0,000377] lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
[+0,000478] lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
[+0,000498]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[+0,001012] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[+0,000831] 3 locks held by ksmbd:r5445/3609:
[+0,000484] #0: ffff88800654af78 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: smbdirect_sk_close+0x122/0x790 [smbdirect]
[+0,001000] #1: ffff888020a40458 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},
at: rdma_lock_handler+0x17/0x30 [rdma_cm]
[+0,000982] #2: ffff888020a40350 (&id_priv->qp_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},
at: rdma_destroy_qp+0x5d/0x1f0 [rdma_cm]
[+0,000934]
stack backtrace:
[+0,000589] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3609 Comm: ksmbd:r5445 Kdump: loaded
Tainted: G OE
6.18.0-rc5-metze-kasan-lockdep.02+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[+0,000023] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
[+0,000004] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox,
BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
...
[+0,000010] print_deadlock_bug+0x245/0x330
[+0,000014] validate_chain+0x32a/0x590
[+0,000012] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30
[+0,000013] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240
[+0,000017] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360
[+0,000013] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000007] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90
[+0,000012] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140
[+0,000006] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360
[+0,000028] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0
[+0,000009] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360
[+0,000008] inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360
[+0,000010] kernel_sock_shutdown+0x5b/0x90
[+0,000011] rxe_qp_do_cleanup+0x4ef/0x810 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000043] ? __pfx_rxe_qp_do_cleanup+0x10/0x10 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000030] execute_in_process_context+0x2b/0x170
[+0,000013] rxe_qp_cleanup+0x1c/0x30 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000021] __rxe_cleanup+0x1cf/0x2e0 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000036] ? __pfx___rxe_cleanup+0x10/0x10 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000020] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000006] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[+0,000012] rxe_destroy_qp+0xe1/0x230 [rdma_rxe]
[+0,000035] ib_destroy_qp_user+0x217/0x450 [ib_core]
[+0,000074] rdma_destroy_qp+0x83/0x1f0 [rdma_cm]
[+0,000034] smbdirect_connection_destroy_qp+0x98/0x2e0 [smbdirect]
[+0,000017] ? __pfx_smb_direct_logging_needed+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd]
[+0,000044] smbdirect_connection_destroy+0x698/0xed0 [smbdirect]
[+0,000023] ? __pfx_smbdirect_connection_destroy+0x10/0x10 [smbdirect]
[+0,000033] ? __pfx_smb_direct_logging_needed+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd]
[+0,000031] smbdirect_connection_destroy_sync+0x42b/0x9f0 [smbdirect]
[+0,000029] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90
[+0,000012] ? __pfx_smbdirect_connection_destroy_sync+0x10/0x10 [smbdirect]
[+0,000019] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000007] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x64/0x70
[+0,000029] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000010] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000006] ? __smbdirect_connection_schedule_disconnect+0x339/0x4b0
[+0,000021] smbdirect_sk_destroy+0xb0/0x680 [smbdirect]
[+0,000024] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000006] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x64/0x70
[+0,000006] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000005] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xba/0x150
[+0,000011] sk_common_release+0x66/0x340
[+0,000010] smbdirect_sk_close+0x12a/0x790 [smbdirect]
[+0,000023] ? ip_mc_drop_socket+0x1e/0x240
[+0,000013] inet_release+0x10a/0x240
[+0,000011] smbdirect_sock_release+0x502/0xe80 [smbdirect]
[+0,000015] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000024] sock_release+0x91/0x1c0
[+0,000010] smb_direct_free_transport+0x31/0x50 [ksmbd]
[+0,000025] ksmbd_conn_free+0x1d0/0x240 [ksmbd]
[+0,000040] smb_direct_disconnect+0xb2/0x120 [ksmbd]
[+0,000023] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[+0,000018] ksmbd_conn_handler_loop+0x94e/0xf10 [ksmbd]
...
I'll also add reclassify to the smbdirect socket code [1],
but I think it's better to have it in both direction
(below and above the RDMA layer).
[1]
https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-ipproto-smbdirect
Cc: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
index ac0183a2ff7a..39d867d7b443 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
@@ -18,6 +18,21 @@
#include "rxe_net.h"
#include "rxe_loc.h"
+static struct lock_class_key rxe_recv_sk_key;
+static struct lock_class_key rxe_recv_slock_key;
+
+static inline void rxe_reclassify_recv_socket(struct socket *sock)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!sock_allow_reclassification(sk)))
+ return;
+
+ sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk,
+ "slock-RDMA-RXE-RECV", &rxe_recv_slock_key,
+ "sk_lock-RDMA-RXE-RECV", &rxe_recv_sk_key);
+}
+
static struct rxe_recv_sockets recv_sockets;
static struct dst_entry *rxe_find_route4(struct rxe_qp *qp,
@@ -192,6 +207,7 @@ static struct socket *rxe_setup_udp_tunnel(struct net *net, __be16 port,
err = udp_sock_create(net, &udp_cfg, &sock);
if (err < 0)
return ERR_PTR(err);
+ rxe_reclassify_recv_socket(sock);
tnl_cfg.encap_type = 1;
tnl_cfg.encap_rcv = rxe_udp_encap_recv;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
index 95f1c1c2949d..4330d98102d0 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
@@ -15,6 +15,21 @@
#include "rxe_queue.h"
#include "rxe_task.h"
+static struct lock_class_key rxe_send_sk_key;
+static struct lock_class_key rxe_send_slock_key;
+
+static inline void rxe_reclassify_send_socket(struct socket *sock)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!sock_allow_reclassification(sk)))
+ return;
+
+ sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk,
+ "slock-RDMA-RXE-SEND", &rxe_send_slock_key,
+ "sk_lock-RDMA-RXE-SEND", &rxe_send_sk_key);
+}
+
static int rxe_qp_chk_cap(struct rxe_dev *rxe, struct ib_qp_cap *cap,
int has_srq)
{
@@ -244,6 +259,7 @@ static int rxe_qp_init_req(struct rxe_dev *rxe, struct rxe_qp *qp,
err = sock_create_kern(&init_net, AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, &qp->sk);
if (err < 0)
return err;
+ rxe_reclassify_send_socket(qp->sk);
qp->sk->sk->sk_user_data = qp;
/* pick a source UDP port number for this QP based on
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists