[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126125951-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:00:25 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Dan Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, parav@...dia.com,
shshitrit@...dia.com, yohadt@...dia.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, kevin.tian@...el.com,
kuba@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 07/12] virtio_net: Implement layer 2 ethtool
flow rules
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 10:25:44AM -0600, Dan Jurgens wrote:
> On 11/24/25 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 01:15:18PM -0600, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> >> @@ -5681,6 +5710,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
> >> .get_rxfh_fields = virtnet_get_hashflow,
> >> .set_rxfh_fields = virtnet_set_hashflow,
> >> .get_rx_ring_count = virtnet_get_rx_ring_count,
> >> + .set_rxnfc = virtnet_set_rxnfc,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static void virtnet_get_queue_stats_rx(struct net_device *dev, int i,
> >
> > should we not wire up get_rxnfc too? weird to be able to set but
> > not get.
> >
>
> I prefer to do that as the last patch. That's what really turn the
> feature on. ethtool need to do gets before it can set. Also, this patch
> is already quite large.
ok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists