[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126153057.2bbc21d0@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 15:30:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Arkadiusz Kubalewski
<arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, richardcochran@...il.com, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org, aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Grzegorz
Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/11] ice: add support for unmanaged DPLL on
E830 NIC
On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:36:20 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> +int ice_is_health_status_code_supported(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 code,
> + bool *supported)
> +{
> + const int BUFF_SIZE = ICE_AQC_HEALTH_STATUS_CODE_NUM;
> + struct ice_aqc_health_status_supp_elem *buff;
> + int ret;
> +
> + buff = kcalloc(BUFF_SIZE, sizeof(*buff), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buff)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = ice_aq_get_health_status_supported(hw, buff, BUFF_SIZE);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_buff;
> + for (int i = 0; i < BUFF_SIZE && buff[i].health_status_code; i++)
> + if (le16_to_cpu(buff[i].health_status_code) == code) {
> + *supported = true;
> + break;
> + }
Claude Code review says you may not find the @code ...
> +free_buff:
> + kfree(buff);
> + return ret;
.. but still report 0 ..
> + /* Initialize unmanaged DPLL detection */
> + {
> + u16 code = ICE_AQC_HEALTH_STATUS_INFO_LOSS_OF_LOCK;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = ice_is_health_status_code_supported(&pf->hw, code,
> + &pf->dplls.unmanaged);
> + if (err || !ice_is_unmanaged_cgu_in_netlist(&pf->hw))
> + pf->dplls.unmanaged = false;
.. which is not handled here
> + }
BTW floating code block like:
{
int i;
bla(i);
}
Is not an acceptable coding style upstream.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists