[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSmNRDG8RAHVoC7C@chamomile>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:53:40 +0000
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"D . Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove KMSG_COMPONENT macro
Hi Jakub,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 06:11:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 15:07:05 +0100 Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 3 +--
> > net/iucv/iucv.c | 3 +--
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_app.c | 3 +--
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 3 +--
>
> Jozsef, Pablo, should we ask the author to split this up or just apply as is?
Patch looks trivial, and not so large for a tree wide.
But I'm Cc'ing Julian Anastasov so he has a chance to ack the IPVS bits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists